Vyhledávání slova "identical’".

The Convenient Application of "intent"..................... . {{file t=OpzO_1575839755}} . If Senator Lindsey Graham is correct - tomorrow the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz will release a much anticipated review, looking into how the FBI and DOJ used an application to the FISA court to investigate the Trump campaign. There are wide-ranging opinions about what exactly this report may, or may not, outline. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/08/varying-expectations-for-ig-horowitz-report-the-convenient-application-of-intent/#more-178081 . {{file t=9qggu_1575839883}} . The IG review has been ongoing for 21 months. This report is anticipated to be a culmination of that investigative effort. The 'tick-tock club' of Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, John Solomon and various Fox pundits have promised the report will be the most devastating outline of gross FBI and DOJ misconduct in the history of IG review. Additionally, a network of financially dependent social media voices, book writers, podcast pundits and Q-theorists collectively known as the 'trusty plan group', have predicted criminal indictments, wide-scale arrests and a shock to the DC system that will fracture the foundation of the administrative state and simultaneously drain the swamp. Meanwhile the Lawfare group has been the most visible advocacy network for the current and former DOJ and FBI officials who participated in setting up and using the FISA surveillance system now under IG review. The Lawfare group has stated the IG report will exonerate all of their pre and post election activity; validate the justification for their predicate efforts; and leave the 'tick-tockers' and 'trusty planners' having to reconcile to their stunned audiences how they interpreted all the data so incredibly wrong. A review of the last three IG reports which brush up against the same DOJ and FBI network: (1) IG review Clinton email/FBI conduct; . {{file t=9jVej_1575840517}} . Comey and Family Big Hillary Clinton Supporters . {{file t=kjZ0t_1575840602}} . (2) IG review of McCabe/media leaks; and . McCabe's wife got funding from a Hillary fundraiser . {{file t=CTQRT_1575841000}} . (3) IG review of James Comey conduct; . Appointed by Obama . {{file t=CiqRF_1575841220}} . ........shows the IG report on FISA is likely to come down somewhere in the middle. ie. mistakes were made; poor judgements were evident; some unprofessional conduct was found; some lack of candor was identified; department policies were not followed; but no direct evidence of intentional wrongdoing was attributable to a coordinated political effort. If prior IG reports are predictive we should see something akin to: .....Everyone collectively just happened to make identical mistakes, at the same time, in the same direction, together with all the administrative staff within all intelligence organizations... many of them were professionally trained lawyers... but no-one did anything wrong on purpose.... Remember the modern mantra for DOJ definitions of legality are all about "intent". (how fucking convenient) Defining statutory violations by the intent of the violator is specifically attributable to how President Obama, AG Eric Holder and AG Loretta Lynch changed the entire enterprise of lawful application to make outcomes arbitrary, variable, changeable to the situation. The IRS targeting wasn't unlawful because it wasn't intentional. The death of four Americans due to sketchy CIA and State Dept. operations in Benghazi was not unlawful because the risky situation wasn't created intentionally. Hillary Clinton's private email server with classified information wasn't "intentional", etcetera - etcetera, the list is long. The nice thing about switching to definitions of lawbreaking by "intent" is the ease in arbitrary application. Republican targets 'intended' to violate laws... Democrat targets, well, not-so-much. Fluidity is a necessary oil amid a two-tiered administrative state. If you elevate, I mean really elevate, and look at the bigger issue inside each of the examples there's a connective thread surrounding a purposeful shift in accountability for broken laws by focusing on "criminal intent." "Intent", not consequence, is now the larger shield being applied toward excusing the action of people within institutions of government and society. Consider: . {{file t=umrcC_1575841463}} . Ah yes, Hillary Clinton was not guilty or accountable because FBI Director James Comey said they couldn't prove intent..... But the statute doesn't require intent... But the DOJ said ignore the statute, they require it... and so it goes. . {{file t=7rc6_1575844507}} . Also see y Číst dále >>>

The Convenient Application of "intent"..................... . {{file t=OpzO_1575839755}} . If Senator Lindsey Graham is correct - tomorrow the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz will release a much anticipated review, looking into how the FBI and DOJ used an application to the FISA court to investigate the Trump campaign. There are wide-ranging opinions about what exactly this report may, or may not, outline. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/08/varying-expectations-for-ig-horowitz-report-the-convenient-application-of-intent/#more-178081 . {{file t=9qggu_1575839883}} . The IG review has been ongoing for 21 months. This report is anticipated to be a culmination of that investigative effort. The 'tick-tock club' of Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, John Solomon and various Fox pundits have promised the report will be the most devastating outline of gross FBI and DOJ misconduct in the history of IG review. Additionally, a network of financially dependent social media voices, book writers, podcast pundits and Q-theorists collectively known as the 'trusty plan group', have predicted criminal indictments, wide-scale arrests and a shock to the DC system that will fracture the foundation of the administrative state and simultaneously drain the swamp. Meanwhile the Lawfare group has been the most visible advocacy network for the current and former DOJ and FBI officials who participated in setting up and using the FISA surveillance system now under IG review. The Lawfare group has stated the IG report will exonerate all of their pre and post election activity; validate the justification for their predicate efforts; and leave the 'tick-tockers' and 'trusty planners' having to reconcile to their stunned audiences how they interpreted all the data so incredibly wrong. A review of the last three IG reports which brush up against the same DOJ and FBI network: (1) IG review Clinton email/FBI conduct; . {{file t=9jVej_1575840517}} . Comey and Family Big Hillary Clinton Supporters . {{file t=kjZ0t_1575840602}} . (2) IG review of McCabe/media leaks; and . McCabe's wife got funding from a Hillary fundraiser . {{file t=CTQRT_1575841000}} . (3) IG review of James Comey conduct; . Appointed by Obama . {{file t=CiqRF_1575841220}} . ........shows the IG report on FISA is likely to come down somewhere in the middle. ie. mistakes were made; poor judgements were evident; some unprofessional conduct was found; some lack of candor was identified; department policies were not followed; but no direct evidence of intentional wrongdoing was attributable to a coordinated political effort. If prior IG reports are predictive we should see something akin to: .....Everyone collectively just happened to make identical mistakes, at the same time, in the same direction, together with all the administrative staff within all intelligence organizations... many of them were professionally trained lawyers... but no-one did anything wrong on purpose.... Remember the modern mantra for DOJ definitions of legality are all about "intent". (how fucking convenient) Defining statutory violations by the intent of the violator is specifically attributable to how President Obama, AG Eric Holder and AG Loretta Lynch changed the entire enterprise of lawful application to make outcomes arbitrary, variable, changeable to the situation. The IRS targeting wasn't unlawful because it wasn't intentional. The death of four Americans due to sketchy CIA and State Dept. operations in Benghazi was not unlawful because the risky situation wasn't created intentionally. Hillary Clinton's private email server with classified information wasn't "intentional", etcetera - etcetera, the list is long. The nice thing about switching to definitions of lawbreaking by "intent" is the ease in arbitrary application. Republican targets 'intended' to violate laws... Democrat targets, well, not-so-much. Fluidity is a necessary oil amid a two-tiered administrative state. If you elevate, I mean really elevate, and look at the bigger issue inside each of the examples there's a connective thread surrounding a purposeful shift in accountability for broken laws by focusing on "criminal intent." "Intent", not consequence, is now the larger shield being applied toward excusing the action of people within institutions of government and society. Consider: . {{file t=umrcC_1575841463}} . Ah yes, Hillary Clinton was not guilty or accountable because FBI Director James Comey said they couldn't prove intent..... But the statute doesn't require intent... But the DOJ said ignore the statute, they require it... and so it goes. . {{file t=7rc6_1575844507}} . Also see y Číst dále >>>

The Convenient Application of "intent"..................... . {{file t=OpzO_1575839755}} . If Senator Lindsey Graham is correct - tomorrow the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz will release a much anticipated review, looking into how the FBI and DOJ used an application to the FISA court to investigate the Trump campaign. There are wide-ranging opinions about what exactly this report may, or may not, outline. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/08/varying-expectations-for-ig-horowitz-report-the-convenient-application-of-intent/#more-178081 . {{file t=9qggu_1575839883}} . The IG review has been ongoing for 21 months. This report is anticipated to be a culmination of that investigative effort. The 'tick-tock club' of Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, John Solomon and various Fox pundits have promised the report will be the most devastating outline of gross FBI and DOJ misconduct in the history of IG review. Additionally, a network of financially dependent social media voices, book writers, podcast pundits and Q-theorists collectively known as the 'trusty plan group', have predicted criminal indictments, wide-scale arrests and a shock to the DC system that will fracture the foundation of the administrative state and simultaneously drain the swamp. Meanwhile the Lawfare group has been the most visible advocacy network for the current and former DOJ and FBI officials who participated in setting up and using the FISA surveillance system now under IG review. The Lawfare group has stated the IG report will exonerate all of their pre and post election activity; validate the justification for their predicate efforts; and leave the 'tick-tockers' and 'trusty planners' having to reconcile to their stunned audiences how they interpreted all the data so incredibly wrong. A review of the last three IG reports which brush up against the same DOJ and FBI network: (1) IG review Clinton email/FBI conduct; . {{file t=9jVej_1575840517}} . Comey and Family Big Hillary Clinton Supporters . {{file t=kjZ0t_1575840602}} . (2) IG review of McCabe/media leaks; and . McCabe's wife got funding from a Hillary fundraiser . {{file t=CTQRT_1575841000}} . (3) IG review of James Comey conduct; . Appointed by Obama . {{file t=CiqRF_1575841220}} . ........shows the IG report on FISA is likely to come down somewhere in the middle. ie. mistakes were made; poor judgements were evident; some unprofessional conduct was found; some lack of candor was identified; department policies were not followed; but no direct evidence of intentional wrongdoing was attributable to a coordinated political effort. If prior IG reports are predictive we should see something akin to: .....Everyone collectively just happened to make identical mistakes, at the same time, in the same direction, together with all the administrative staff within all intelligence organizations... many of them were professionally trained lawyers... but no-one did anything wrong on purpose.... Remember the modern mantra for DOJ definitions of legality are all about "intent". (how fucking convenient) Defining statutory violations by the intent of the violator is specifically attributable to how President Obama, AG Eric Holder and AG Loretta Lynch changed the entire enterprise of lawful application to make outcomes arbitrary, variable, changeable to the situation. The IRS targeting wasn't unlawful because it wasn't intentional. The death of four Americans due to sketchy CIA and State Dept. operations in Benghazi was not unlawful because the risky situation wasn't created intentionally. Hillary Clinton's private email server with classified information wasn't "intentional", etcetera - etcetera, the list is long. The nice thing about switching to definitions of lawbreaking by "intent" is the ease in arbitrary application. Republican targets 'intended' to violate laws... Democrat targets, well, not-so-much. Fluidity is a necessary oil amid a two-tiered administrative state. If you elevate, I mean really elevate, and look at the bigger issue inside each of the examples there's a connective thread surrounding a purposeful shift in accountability for broken laws by focusing on "criminal intent." "Intent", not consequence, is now the larger shield being applied toward excusing the action of people within institutions of government and society. Consider: . {{file t=umrcC_1575841463}} . Ah yes, Hillary Clinton was not guilty or accountable because FBI Director James Comey said they couldn't prove intent..... But the statute doesn't require intent... But the DOJ said ignore the statute, they require it... and so it goes. . {{file t=7rc6_1575844507}} . Also see y Číst dále >>>

IF you are getting glammed up for Christmas, it pays to tweak an old outfit rather than buying new. Out of the £3.5billion expected to be spent on clothes for the party season, around eight million items will only be worn once. To avoid splashing the cash, here are top tips on how to look […] Číst dále >>>

Three dimensional paper snowflakes look beautiful hanging in a window or on a wall. Fun for kids or adults, they are easy to make. Some like them for Christmas, but you may like them any time! Číst dále >>>