Hlavní strana > Multimedia > Video > Zprávy > 14.11.2019
Prohledáno za: 0.013sec. V této kategorii je registrováno 69 zdrojů.
RSS Přidej na Seznam.cz Add to Google

Multimedia - Video - Zprávy - 14. listopadu 2019

Zvolte si dnešní den, nebo celý tento měsíc, nebo pro změnu data použijte kalendář.

Strana: 1/ 119 Celkem nalezeno 1183 záznamů.

EXCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON ROGER STONE TRIAL! - 14Nov19 Full Show

Náhled

*00:00:00 Roger Stone *Rand Paul uses the "C-word" Middle of H1S3 CIA Bolivian coup is just like the 1953 Iranian coup "Operation Ajax" *Chris Wallace, FOX News, gets a thrill talking about Trump accuser, Taylor *Jim Jordan absolutely destroyed Taylor's testimony *High school students protest Chik-Fil-A, Coca-Cola pushed parents to push transgender confusion on kids, Disney+ has a new warning to viewers about "outdated cultural depictions" on classic movies *Gerald Celente, TrendsResearch.com, joins to look at Mayor Bloomberg's candidacy, the Bolivian coup, regime change in Middle East & where financial markets are headed *"Whistleblower" who wasn't there, "witnesses" who witnessed nothing, now psychiatrists who've never met Trump, let alone examined him, want to testify about his mental state *White Helmets founder, former MI6, killed *Global Warming? Cold weather is killing cities' electric buses and California is regulating independent contractors (especially owner-operator truckers) out of business Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

EXCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON ROGER STONE TRIAL! - 14Nov19 Full Show

Náhled

*00:00:00 Roger Stone *Rand Paul uses the "C-word" Middle of H1S3 CIA Bolivian coup is just like the 1953 Iranian coup "Operation Ajax" *Chris Wallace, FOX News, gets a thrill talking about Trump accuser, Taylor *Jim Jordan absolutely destroyed Taylor's testimony *High school students protest Chik-Fil-A, Coca-Cola pushed parents to push transgender confusion on kids, Disney+ has a new warning to viewers about "outdated cultural depictions" on classic movies *Gerald Celente, TrendsResearch.com, joins to look at Mayor Bloomberg's candidacy, the Bolivian coup, regime change in Middle East & where financial markets are headed *"Whistleblower" who wasn't there, "witnesses" who witnessed nothing, now psychiatrists who've never met Trump, let alone examined him, want to testify about his mental state *White Helmets founder, former MI6, killed *Global Warming? Cold weather is killing cities' electric buses and California is regulating independent contractors (especially owner-operator truckers) out of business Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

EXCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON ROGER STONE TRIAL! - 14Nov19 Full Show

Náhled

*00:00:00 Roger Stone *Rand Paul uses the "C-word" Middle of H1S3 CIA Bolivian coup is just like the 1953 Iranian coup "Operation Ajax" *Chris Wallace, FOX News, gets a thrill talking about Trump accuser, Taylor *Jim Jordan absolutely destroyed Taylor's testimony *High school students protest Chik-Fil-A, Coca-Cola pushed parents to push transgender confusion on kids, Disney+ has a new warning to viewers about "outdated cultural depictions" on classic movies *Gerald Celente, TrendsResearch.com, joins to look at Mayor Bloomberg's candidacy, the Bolivian coup, regime change in Middle East & where financial markets are headed *"Whistleblower" who wasn't there, "witnesses" who witnessed nothing, now psychiatrists who've never met Trump, let alone examined him, want to testify about his mental state *White Helmets founder, former MI6, killed *Global Warming? Cold weather is killing cities' electric buses and California is regulating independent contractors (especially owner-operator truckers) out of business Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Ex-Republican cries as she explains why she left GOP

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:51
rayten0
Disappointed Republican no longer constitutional
Republican cries explains left

CNN's Kyung Lah travels to the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona, to find out how voters reacted to the first day of impeachment inquiry hearings. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Ex-Republican cries as she explains why she left GOP

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:51
rayten0
Disappointed Republican no longer constitutional
Republican cries explains left

CNN's Kyung Lah travels to the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona, to find out how voters reacted to the first day of impeachment inquiry hearings. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Ex-Republican cries as she explains why she left GOP

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:51
rayten0
Disappointed Republican no longer constitutional
Republican cries explains left

CNN's Kyung Lah travels to the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona, to find out how voters reacted to the first day of impeachment inquiry hearings. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

DemocRATS FAILING BIG TIME at their sham impeachment hearings! LOL!

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:48
chopper20
democrats, impeachment, hoax, failure, treason, pe
DemocRATS FAILING TIME their sham impeachment hearings

Trump will win in 2020 because Americans are sick and tired of the slime ball pedophile democRATS and their creepy weird cult leaders... Jason Chaffetz: Why Schiff's whistleblower claims at Trump impeachment hearing are impossible to believe Schiff ends impeachment hearing insisting he doesn't know whistleblower Rep. Adam Schiff sticks to his story that he doesn't know the whistleblower Americans had a front-row seat for Day One of impeachment inquiry hearings in the House on Wednesday. But missing from the testimony on Capitol Hill was the "witness" who started it all. Six grueling hours of testimony by two hearsay witnesses shed little light on the allegations against President Trump. Neither George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for Europe nor William Taylor, the charge d'affaires in Kiev had firsthand information and both clearly had an ax to grind over their differences with the president on foreign policy. More interesting than their testimony was the complete whitewashing of any reference to the original whistleblower, whose second-hand allegations so deeply concerned House Democrats that they opened an official impeachment inquiry - a process they had three times explicitly rejected in previous House votes. BOSSIE: IMPEACHMENT CASE AGAINST TRUMP IS FALLING APART - DEMOCRATS WANT TO HURT HIM IN 2020 ELECTION What was so compelling about the testimony of this witness that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had long held that impeachment should only proceed as a bipartisan effort, would abandon her position and pursue a one-sided inquiry? Americans still don't know. In the first day of testimony, there was barely any mention of the original witness or the transcript of the call that lies at the center of the allegations. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff went to great lengths to suppress any reference to the witness during the first day of testimony, even going so far as to claim (laughably) that he doesn't know who the witness is. Let's think about that for a moment. We know that the whistleblower met with Schiff's STAFF. Are we supposed to believe that the Congressman stepped out of the office when he arrived or hid in another room when the whistleblower meeting took place? The notion that Adam Schiff doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. Is Schiff trying to tell us that his staff told him, "We've just met with the whistleblower." To which he replied, "don't tell me his name! I don't want to meet him! But let me use everything he just told to impeach the president." Who could believe that? Such a scenario is not only ridiculous, but it would also be irresponsible. Remember, this is the same Schiff whose promises of "ample evidence of collusion in plain sight" were repudiated by the final Mueller Report. He is hardly a beacon of credibility, but the notion that he doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. He Who Must Not Be Named is not expected to testify at all. That's totally unacceptable. The American people cannot be expected to accept a partisan impeachment inquiry in which only one side calls witnesses, exculpatory evidence is suppressed, and the primary witness cannot be identified, much less questioned. Particularly given the fact that the whistleblower is no whistleblower, having no firsthand knowledge of the allegations. But he or she does have firsthand knowledge of the machinations within the White House designed to thwart a sitting president. That testimony is relevant. We know what justice looks like. This is not justice. The House Intelligence Committee is neither an impeachment committee nor a Grand Jury. More from Opinion Tucker Carlson: It's never been clear what Dems believe is Trump's impeachable offense. Now we know. It's THIS Leslie Marshall: Trump, impeachment and the future - Here's what I tell my Democratic friends Andrew McCarthy: Elections, not impeachments are how we resolve policy disputes in this country With great fanfare, Speaker Pelosi initiated the formal impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump in September promising that, "no one is above the law." She claimed the president's actions "have seriously violated the Constitution." CLICK HERE TO GET OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER That's not what viewers saw on this first day of public testimony. If there are violations of the law or the Constitution by this president, these witnesses couldn't testify to it. Their accounts were based on hearsay, opinion and media reports. If anyone has been treated as thou Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

DemocRATS FAILING BIG TIME at their sham impeachment hearings! LOL!

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:48
chopper20
democrats, impeachment, hoax, failure, treason, pe
DemocRATS FAILING TIME their sham impeachment hearings

Trump will win in 2020 because Americans are sick and tired of the slime ball pedophile democRATS and their creepy weird cult leaders... Jason Chaffetz: Why Schiff's whistleblower claims at Trump impeachment hearing are impossible to believe Schiff ends impeachment hearing insisting he doesn't know whistleblower Rep. Adam Schiff sticks to his story that he doesn't know the whistleblower Americans had a front-row seat for Day One of impeachment inquiry hearings in the House on Wednesday. But missing from the testimony on Capitol Hill was the "witness" who started it all. Six grueling hours of testimony by two hearsay witnesses shed little light on the allegations against President Trump. Neither George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for Europe nor William Taylor, the charge d'affaires in Kiev had firsthand information and both clearly had an ax to grind over their differences with the president on foreign policy. More interesting than their testimony was the complete whitewashing of any reference to the original whistleblower, whose second-hand allegations so deeply concerned House Democrats that they opened an official impeachment inquiry - a process they had three times explicitly rejected in previous House votes. BOSSIE: IMPEACHMENT CASE AGAINST TRUMP IS FALLING APART - DEMOCRATS WANT TO HURT HIM IN 2020 ELECTION What was so compelling about the testimony of this witness that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had long held that impeachment should only proceed as a bipartisan effort, would abandon her position and pursue a one-sided inquiry? Americans still don't know. In the first day of testimony, there was barely any mention of the original witness or the transcript of the call that lies at the center of the allegations. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff went to great lengths to suppress any reference to the witness during the first day of testimony, even going so far as to claim (laughably) that he doesn't know who the witness is. Let's think about that for a moment. We know that the whistleblower met with Schiff's STAFF. Are we supposed to believe that the Congressman stepped out of the office when he arrived or hid in another room when the whistleblower meeting took place? The notion that Adam Schiff doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. Is Schiff trying to tell us that his staff told him, "We've just met with the whistleblower." To which he replied, "don't tell me his name! I don't want to meet him! But let me use everything he just told to impeach the president." Who could believe that? Such a scenario is not only ridiculous, but it would also be irresponsible. Remember, this is the same Schiff whose promises of "ample evidence of collusion in plain sight" were repudiated by the final Mueller Report. He is hardly a beacon of credibility, but the notion that he doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. He Who Must Not Be Named is not expected to testify at all. That's totally unacceptable. The American people cannot be expected to accept a partisan impeachment inquiry in which only one side calls witnesses, exculpatory evidence is suppressed, and the primary witness cannot be identified, much less questioned. Particularly given the fact that the whistleblower is no whistleblower, having no firsthand knowledge of the allegations. But he or she does have firsthand knowledge of the machinations within the White House designed to thwart a sitting president. That testimony is relevant. We know what justice looks like. This is not justice. The House Intelligence Committee is neither an impeachment committee nor a Grand Jury. More from Opinion Tucker Carlson: It's never been clear what Dems believe is Trump's impeachable offense. Now we know. It's THIS Leslie Marshall: Trump, impeachment and the future - Here's what I tell my Democratic friends Andrew McCarthy: Elections, not impeachments are how we resolve policy disputes in this country With great fanfare, Speaker Pelosi initiated the formal impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump in September promising that, "no one is above the law." She claimed the president's actions "have seriously violated the Constitution." CLICK HERE TO GET OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER That's not what viewers saw on this first day of public testimony. If there are violations of the law or the Constitution by this president, these witnesses couldn't testify to it. Their accounts were based on hearsay, opinion and media reports. If anyone has been treated as thou Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

DemocRATS FAILING BIG TIME at their sham impeachment hearings! LOL!

Náhled
14.11.2019 23:48
chopper20
democrats, impeachment, hoax, failure, treason, pe
DemocRATS FAILING TIME their sham impeachment hearings

Trump will win in 2020 because Americans are sick and tired of the slime ball pedophile democRATS and their creepy weird cult leaders... Jason Chaffetz: Why Schiff's whistleblower claims at Trump impeachment hearing are impossible to believe Schiff ends impeachment hearing insisting he doesn't know whistleblower Rep. Adam Schiff sticks to his story that he doesn't know the whistleblower Americans had a front-row seat for Day One of impeachment inquiry hearings in the House on Wednesday. But missing from the testimony on Capitol Hill was the "witness" who started it all. Six grueling hours of testimony by two hearsay witnesses shed little light on the allegations against President Trump. Neither George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for Europe nor William Taylor, the charge d'affaires in Kiev had firsthand information and both clearly had an ax to grind over their differences with the president on foreign policy. More interesting than their testimony was the complete whitewashing of any reference to the original whistleblower, whose second-hand allegations so deeply concerned House Democrats that they opened an official impeachment inquiry - a process they had three times explicitly rejected in previous House votes. BOSSIE: IMPEACHMENT CASE AGAINST TRUMP IS FALLING APART - DEMOCRATS WANT TO HURT HIM IN 2020 ELECTION What was so compelling about the testimony of this witness that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had long held that impeachment should only proceed as a bipartisan effort, would abandon her position and pursue a one-sided inquiry? Americans still don't know. In the first day of testimony, there was barely any mention of the original witness or the transcript of the call that lies at the center of the allegations. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff went to great lengths to suppress any reference to the witness during the first day of testimony, even going so far as to claim (laughably) that he doesn't know who the witness is. Let's think about that for a moment. We know that the whistleblower met with Schiff's STAFF. Are we supposed to believe that the Congressman stepped out of the office when he arrived or hid in another room when the whistleblower meeting took place? The notion that Adam Schiff doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. Is Schiff trying to tell us that his staff told him, "We've just met with the whistleblower." To which he replied, "don't tell me his name! I don't want to meet him! But let me use everything he just told to impeach the president." Who could believe that? Such a scenario is not only ridiculous, but it would also be irresponsible. Remember, this is the same Schiff whose promises of "ample evidence of collusion in plain sight" were repudiated by the final Mueller Report. He is hardly a beacon of credibility, but the notion that he doesn't know the identity of a whistleblower so many in Washington can already identify by name is laughable. He Who Must Not Be Named is not expected to testify at all. That's totally unacceptable. The American people cannot be expected to accept a partisan impeachment inquiry in which only one side calls witnesses, exculpatory evidence is suppressed, and the primary witness cannot be identified, much less questioned. Particularly given the fact that the whistleblower is no whistleblower, having no firsthand knowledge of the allegations. But he or she does have firsthand knowledge of the machinations within the White House designed to thwart a sitting president. That testimony is relevant. We know what justice looks like. This is not justice. The House Intelligence Committee is neither an impeachment committee nor a Grand Jury. More from Opinion Tucker Carlson: It's never been clear what Dems believe is Trump's impeachable offense. Now we know. It's THIS Leslie Marshall: Trump, impeachment and the future - Here's what I tell my Democratic friends Andrew McCarthy: Elections, not impeachments are how we resolve policy disputes in this country With great fanfare, Speaker Pelosi initiated the formal impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump in September promising that, "no one is above the law." She claimed the president's actions "have seriously violated the Constitution." CLICK HERE TO GET OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER That's not what viewers saw on this first day of public testimony. If there are violations of the law or the Constitution by this president, these witnesses couldn't testify to it. Their accounts were based on hearsay, opinion and media reports. If anyone has been treated as thou Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Cold Call

Náhled

A new Channel 5 drama coming next week... Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Strana: 1/ 119 Celkem nalezeno 1183 záznamů.

Líbí se Vám tato stránka? Sdílejte ji s ostatními.

Přidat.eu záložku

uživatelské kanályVlastní zdroje: Multimedia - Video - Zprávy

Přidejte svůj vlastní RSS zdroj, který budete vitět pouze Vy na stránkách jednotlivých kategorií. Maximální počet na každé stránce je 8.

Pro změny se prosím přihlašte ke svému účtu.

 

+ Přidej RSS kanál | Copyright (c) 2009 Seznam.name. All rights reserved. Created by Kukej | Kontakt | Výměna odkazů

0.44956