Hlavní strana > Zpravodajství > Sport > > 15.3.2019
Prohledáno za: 0.019sec. V této kategorii je registrováno 150 zdrojů.
RSS Přidej na Seznam.cz Add to Google

Zpravodajství - Sport - - 15. března 2019

Zvolte si dnešní den, nebo celý tento měsíc, nebo pro změnu data použijte kalendář.

Strana: 5/ 262 Celkem nalezeno 2616 záznamů.

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means

Náhled

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means Qualcomm scored a victory today (March 15) in its ongoing legal dispute with Apple over mobile phone patents, as a jury awarded the chip maker $31 million in damages.Credit: Tom's GuideSpecifically, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X infringe on two of Qualcomm's patents, and that the iPhone 8, 8 Plus and X also infringe on a third.Considering that Apple tallied a little less than $265.6 billion in sales during its 2018 fiscal year, that $31 million judgment isn't likely to sting too badly. But it does give Qualcomm some legal backing for its argument that Apple has benefited from its technology, especially with an even bigger court case looming next month. "From a monetary perspective, this is hardly a victory at all — both sides probably spent as much as the verdict amount on legal fees," said Avi Greengart, founder and lead analyst for research firm Techsponential. "But this does set a precedent that Qualcomm’s IP is valuable, even the patents on elements of a phone that are not directly related to wireless standards."MORE: iPhone Banned? Here's What's Going on in Apple-Qualcomm FeudThe Apple-Qualcomm dispute stretches back two years, with Apple claiming Qualcomm charges royalties for things that it has nothing to do with. Qualcomm counters that its patents covering the way phones connect to wireless networks are essential to today's smartphones, and it wants recognition — and royalties — for that."The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly," said Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel in a statement announcing the legal win. "The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm’s valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents."For its part, Apple expressed disappointment with the verdict in a statement provided to Tom's Guide. "Qualcomm's ongoing campaign of patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to distract from the larger issues they face with investigations into their business practices in US federal court, and around the world," the statement read.What's next for Apple vs Qualcomm is much bigger Qualcomm's legal victory today covers a case that's only one of many legal tussles playing out in courtrooms around the world. The most significant case goes to trial next month in San Diego, as a federal judge considers whether Apple owes Qualcomm royalty payments for the iPhone. Qualcomm is also awaiting a judge's ruling in a case that wrapped up in January where the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm uses anti-competitive practices in how it licenses its patents."Next month’s case on licensing [between Apple and Qualcomm] will affect billions of dollars in fees that Apple and most phone vendors pay Qualcomm," Greengart said. "The stakes in that case are higher: the dollar amounts are staggering, and it goes to the core of Qualcomm’s business model."Today's ruling is likely to have little impact on your future iPhone, but that could change pending the results of future legal cases. "We will have to see how the other, larger case next month plays out, but it could certainly impact the dollar value associated with core wireless standard IP going forward," Greengart said.Qualcomm scored a pair of legal victories late last year overseas. In China, a court ruled in Qualcomm's favor that Apple had violated the chip maker's patents, though Apple is appealing that ruling, while issuing software update to bring the iPhone in compliance with the court's decision. Apple wasn't so lucky in Germany, where a Munich court blocked the sales of certain older iPhones that use chips from Intel. Other claims by Qualcomm against Apple have been dismissed in some German courts. * iPhone Buying Guide: Which Apple Phone Is Right for You? * Here Are the 10 Best Phones Available * The Ride Is Over: Apple Faces the End of the iPhone Boom Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means

Náhled

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means Qualcomm scored a victory today (March 15) in its ongoing legal dispute with Apple over mobile phone patents, as a jury awarded the chip maker $31 million in damages.Credit: Tom's GuideSpecifically, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X infringe on two of Qualcomm's patents, and that the iPhone 8, 8 Plus and X also infringe on a third.Considering that Apple tallied a little less than $265.6 billion in sales during its 2018 fiscal year, that $31 million judgment isn't likely to sting too badly. But it does give Qualcomm some legal backing for its argument that Apple has benefited from its technology, especially with an even bigger court case looming next month. "From a monetary perspective, this is hardly a victory at all — both sides probably spent as much as the verdict amount on legal fees," said Avi Greengart, founder and lead analyst for research firm Techsponential. "But this does set a precedent that Qualcomm’s IP is valuable, even the patents on elements of a phone that are not directly related to wireless standards."MORE: iPhone Banned? Here's What's Going on in Apple-Qualcomm FeudThe Apple-Qualcomm dispute stretches back two years, with Apple claiming Qualcomm charges royalties for things that it has nothing to do with. Qualcomm counters that its patents covering the way phones connect to wireless networks are essential to today's smartphones, and it wants recognition — and royalties — for that."The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly," said Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel in a statement announcing the legal win. "The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm’s valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents."For its part, Apple expressed disappointment with the verdict in a statement provided to Tom's Guide. "Qualcomm's ongoing campaign of patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to distract from the larger issues they face with investigations into their business practices in US federal court, and around the world," the statement read.What's next for Apple vs Qualcomm is much bigger Qualcomm's legal victory today covers a case that's only one of many legal tussles playing out in courtrooms around the world. The most significant case goes to trial next month in San Diego, as a federal judge considers whether Apple owes Qualcomm royalty payments for the iPhone. Qualcomm is also awaiting a judge's ruling in a case that wrapped up in January where the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm uses anti-competitive practices in how it licenses its patents."Next month’s case on licensing [between Apple and Qualcomm] will affect billions of dollars in fees that Apple and most phone vendors pay Qualcomm," Greengart said. "The stakes in that case are higher: the dollar amounts are staggering, and it goes to the core of Qualcomm’s business model."Today's ruling is likely to have little impact on your future iPhone, but that could change pending the results of future legal cases. "We will have to see how the other, larger case next month plays out, but it could certainly impact the dollar value associated with core wireless standard IP going forward," Greengart said.Qualcomm scored a pair of legal victories late last year overseas. In China, a court ruled in Qualcomm's favor that Apple had violated the chip maker's patents, though Apple is appealing that ruling, while issuing software update to bring the iPhone in compliance with the court's decision. Apple wasn't so lucky in Germany, where a Munich court blocked the sales of certain older iPhones that use chips from Intel. Other claims by Qualcomm against Apple have been dismissed in some German courts. * iPhone Buying Guide: Which Apple Phone Is Right for You? * Here Are the 10 Best Phones Available * The Ride Is Over: Apple Faces the End of the iPhone Boom Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means

Náhled

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means Qualcomm scored a victory today (March 15) in its ongoing legal dispute with Apple over mobile phone patents, as a jury awarded the chip maker $31 million in damages.Credit: Tom's GuideSpecifically, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X infringe on two of Qualcomm's patents, and that the iPhone 8, 8 Plus and X also infringe on a third.Considering that Apple tallied a little less than $265.6 billion in sales during its 2018 fiscal year, that $31 million judgment isn't likely to sting too badly. But it does give Qualcomm some legal backing for its argument that Apple has benefited from its technology, especially with an even bigger court case looming next month. "From a monetary perspective, this is hardly a victory at all — both sides probably spent as much as the verdict amount on legal fees," said Avi Greengart, founder and lead analyst for research firm Techsponential. "But this does set a precedent that Qualcomm’s IP is valuable, even the patents on elements of a phone that are not directly related to wireless standards."MORE: iPhone Banned? Here's What's Going on in Apple-Qualcomm FeudThe Apple-Qualcomm dispute stretches back two years, with Apple claiming Qualcomm charges royalties for things that it has nothing to do with. Qualcomm counters that its patents covering the way phones connect to wireless networks are essential to today's smartphones, and it wants recognition — and royalties — for that."The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly," said Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel in a statement announcing the legal win. "The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm’s valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents."For its part, Apple expressed disappointment with the verdict in a statement provided to Tom's Guide. "Qualcomm's ongoing campaign of patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to distract from the larger issues they face with investigations into their business practices in US federal court, and around the world," the statement read.What's next for Apple vs Qualcomm is much bigger Qualcomm's legal victory today covers a case that's only one of many legal tussles playing out in courtrooms around the world. The most significant case goes to trial next month in San Diego, as a federal judge considers whether Apple owes Qualcomm royalty payments for the iPhone. Qualcomm is also awaiting a judge's ruling in a case that wrapped up in January where the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm uses anti-competitive practices in how it licenses its patents."Next month’s case on licensing [between Apple and Qualcomm] will affect billions of dollars in fees that Apple and most phone vendors pay Qualcomm," Greengart said. "The stakes in that case are higher: the dollar amounts are staggering, and it goes to the core of Qualcomm’s business model."Today's ruling is likely to have little impact on your future iPhone, but that could change pending the results of future legal cases. "We will have to see how the other, larger case next month plays out, but it could certainly impact the dollar value associated with core wireless standard IP going forward," Greengart said.Qualcomm scored a pair of legal victories late last year overseas. In China, a court ruled in Qualcomm's favor that Apple had violated the chip maker's patents, though Apple is appealing that ruling, while issuing software update to bring the iPhone in compliance with the court's decision. Apple wasn't so lucky in Germany, where a Munich court blocked the sales of certain older iPhones that use chips from Intel. Other claims by Qualcomm against Apple have been dismissed in some German courts. * iPhone Buying Guide: Which Apple Phone Is Right for You? * Here Are the 10 Best Phones Available * The Ride Is Over: Apple Faces the End of the iPhone Boom Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means

Náhled

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means Qualcomm scored a victory today (March 15) in its ongoing legal dispute with Apple over mobile phone patents, as a jury awarded the chip maker $31 million in damages.Credit: Tom's GuideSpecifically, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X infringe on two of Qualcomm's patents, and that the iPhone 8, 8 Plus and X also infringe on a third.Considering that Apple tallied a little less than $265.6 billion in sales during its 2018 fiscal year, that $31 million judgment isn't likely to sting too badly. But it does give Qualcomm some legal backing for its argument that Apple has benefited from its technology, especially with an even bigger court case looming next month. "From a monetary perspective, this is hardly a victory at all — both sides probably spent as much as the verdict amount on legal fees," said Avi Greengart, founder and lead analyst for research firm Techsponential. "But this does set a precedent that Qualcomm’s IP is valuable, even the patents on elements of a phone that are not directly related to wireless standards."MORE: iPhone Banned? Here's What's Going on in Apple-Qualcomm FeudThe Apple-Qualcomm dispute stretches back two years, with Apple claiming Qualcomm charges royalties for things that it has nothing to do with. Qualcomm counters that its patents covering the way phones connect to wireless networks are essential to today's smartphones, and it wants recognition — and royalties — for that."The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly," said Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel in a statement announcing the legal win. "The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm’s valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents."For its part, Apple expressed disappointment with the verdict in a statement provided to Tom's Guide. "Qualcomm's ongoing campaign of patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to distract from the larger issues they face with investigations into their business practices in US federal court, and around the world," the statement read.What's next for Apple vs Qualcomm is much bigger Qualcomm's legal victory today covers a case that's only one of many legal tussles playing out in courtrooms around the world. The most significant case goes to trial next month in San Diego, as a federal judge considers whether Apple owes Qualcomm royalty payments for the iPhone. Qualcomm is also awaiting a judge's ruling in a case that wrapped up in January where the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm uses anti-competitive practices in how it licenses its patents."Next month’s case on licensing [between Apple and Qualcomm] will affect billions of dollars in fees that Apple and most phone vendors pay Qualcomm," Greengart said. "The stakes in that case are higher: the dollar amounts are staggering, and it goes to the core of Qualcomm’s business model."Today's ruling is likely to have little impact on your future iPhone, but that could change pending the results of future legal cases. "We will have to see how the other, larger case next month plays out, but it could certainly impact the dollar value associated with core wireless standard IP going forward," Greengart said.Qualcomm scored a pair of legal victories late last year overseas. In China, a court ruled in Qualcomm's favor that Apple had violated the chip maker's patents, though Apple is appealing that ruling, while issuing software update to bring the iPhone in compliance with the court's decision. Apple wasn't so lucky in Germany, where a Munich court blocked the sales of certain older iPhones that use chips from Intel. Other claims by Qualcomm against Apple have been dismissed in some German courts. * iPhone Buying Guide: Which Apple Phone Is Right for You? * Here Are the 10 Best Phones Available * The Ride Is Over: Apple Faces the End of the iPhone Boom Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means

Náhled

Apple Loses Patent Case to Qualcomm: Here’s What It Means Qualcomm scored a victory today (March 15) in its ongoing legal dispute with Apple over mobile phone patents, as a jury awarded the chip maker $31 million in damages.Credit: Tom's GuideSpecifically, the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X infringe on two of Qualcomm's patents, and that the iPhone 8, 8 Plus and X also infringe on a third.Considering that Apple tallied a little less than $265.6 billion in sales during its 2018 fiscal year, that $31 million judgment isn't likely to sting too badly. But it does give Qualcomm some legal backing for its argument that Apple has benefited from its technology, especially with an even bigger court case looming next month. "From a monetary perspective, this is hardly a victory at all — both sides probably spent as much as the verdict amount on legal fees," said Avi Greengart, founder and lead analyst for research firm Techsponential. "But this does set a precedent that Qualcomm’s IP is valuable, even the patents on elements of a phone that are not directly related to wireless standards."MORE: iPhone Banned? Here's What's Going on in Apple-Qualcomm FeudThe Apple-Qualcomm dispute stretches back two years, with Apple claiming Qualcomm charges royalties for things that it has nothing to do with. Qualcomm counters that its patents covering the way phones connect to wireless networks are essential to today's smartphones, and it wants recognition — and royalties — for that."The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly," said Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel in a statement announcing the legal win. "The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm’s valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents."For its part, Apple expressed disappointment with the verdict in a statement provided to Tom's Guide. "Qualcomm's ongoing campaign of patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to distract from the larger issues they face with investigations into their business practices in US federal court, and around the world," the statement read.What's next for Apple vs Qualcomm is much bigger Qualcomm's legal victory today covers a case that's only one of many legal tussles playing out in courtrooms around the world. The most significant case goes to trial next month in San Diego, as a federal judge considers whether Apple owes Qualcomm royalty payments for the iPhone. Qualcomm is also awaiting a judge's ruling in a case that wrapped up in January where the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Qualcomm uses anti-competitive practices in how it licenses its patents."Next month’s case on licensing [between Apple and Qualcomm] will affect billions of dollars in fees that Apple and most phone vendors pay Qualcomm," Greengart said. "The stakes in that case are higher: the dollar amounts are staggering, and it goes to the core of Qualcomm’s business model."Today's ruling is likely to have little impact on your future iPhone, but that could change pending the results of future legal cases. "We will have to see how the other, larger case next month plays out, but it could certainly impact the dollar value associated with core wireless standard IP going forward," Greengart said.Qualcomm scored a pair of legal victories late last year overseas. In China, a court ruled in Qualcomm's favor that Apple had violated the chip maker's patents, though Apple is appealing that ruling, while issuing software update to bring the iPhone in compliance with the court's decision. Apple wasn't so lucky in Germany, where a Munich court blocked the sales of certain older iPhones that use chips from Intel. Other claims by Qualcomm against Apple have been dismissed in some German courts. * iPhone Buying Guide: Which Apple Phone Is Right for You? * Here Are the 10 Best Phones Available * The Ride Is Over: Apple Faces the End of the iPhone Boom Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Vyhlašovat do novin, že po mně jdou, je nehokejové, vytkl Spartě Bartošák

Náhled

Výborné výkony brankáře Patrika Bartošáka dovedly hokejisty Vítkovic do čtvrtfinále play off extraligy. Číst dále >>>

Klage des Frauen-Nationalteams: US-Verband überrascht, macht aber keine Zusagen

Náhled

Das Frauen-Nationalteam der USA hat wegen Diskriminierung Klage gegen den eigenen Verband eingereicht. Der Präsident antwortet in einem Brief - ohne konkrete Lösungen anzubieten. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Vadis ziet struikelblok voor match tegen STVV: “Het is nu eenmaal zo”

Náhled

enclosure image Er staat veel op het programma voor KAA Gent en Sint-Truiden. In een onderling duel vechten beide clubs voor een plek in Play-Off 1. Vadis Odjidja ziet eens struikelblok voor de wedstrijd. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

New Zealand PM promises gun law reform after 49 killed in mosque shootings

Náhled

New Zealand PM promises gun law reform after 49 killed in mosque shootings The attack, labeled terrorism by the prime minister, was the worst ever peacetime mass killing in New Zealand and the country raised its security threat level to the highest. Armed police were deployed at several locations in all cities, unusual in a country where levels of gun violence are low. The video footage, posted live online as the attack unfolded, showed a man driving to the mosque, entering it and shooting randomly at people inside. Číst dále >>> Přeložit do en

Strana: 5/ 262 Celkem nalezeno 2616 záznamů.

Líbí se Vám tato stránka? Sdílejte ji s ostatními.

Přidat.eu záložku

uživatelské kanályVlastní zdroje: Zpravodajství - Sport -

Přidejte svůj vlastní RSS zdroj, který budete vitět pouze Vy na stránkách jednotlivých kategorií. Maximální počet na každé stránce je 8.

Pro změny se prosím přihlašte ke svému účtu.

 

+ Přidej RSS kanál | Copyright (c) 2009 Seznam.name. All rights reserved. Created by Kukej | Kontakt | Výměna odkazů

1.54766